Details of Court Hearings
NUS Elites Committed Perjury in Court – Help Me To Get To The Court Of Appeal
I am a Singaporean whistleblower who has refused to be silenced about misconduct and abuse of power at the National University of Singapore (“NUS”). I refused to be silenced, even after NUS threatened to retaliate against me. NUS then managed to win a case against me in the High Court of Singapore, in which NUS’s main witness against me repeatedly lied to the Court and thereby committed the crime of perjury. NUS’s court victory against me, in a judgment that is tainted with perjury, has provided NUS with the legal basis to bankrupt me.
Read More
Expert Opinion by Prof Lewis
I have filed the Expert Opinion provided by a Law Professor from the UK on 29 April 2022. The Expert Opinion supports my allegations of perjury by NUS witnesses during the High Court trial in Suit 667 in 2017.
Read More
Police Investigation Into the Perjury of Lily Kong, President of SMU
I have been very troubled by the perjury committed by NUS witnesses in Court which happened during the trial of Suit 667.
A lawyer agreed to look at the documents which prove that Lily Kong committed perjury. After looking at the documents, the lawyer, who gave me his advice pro bono (free of charge) agreed with me that the evidence of Lily Kong’s own written words in her own email proves that Lily Kong lied in Court and committed perjury. The lawyer suggested that I should make a police report about Lily Kong’s perjury, because perjury is a serious crime in Singapore.
9th Day of Trial
1 November 2017 (Posted on 7 Nov 2017) Dear friends,Thank you for attending my trial and for your show of support!Also, a big thank you to those of you who sent me funds for my court hearing fees, which is still short of the total amount needed. (I will post separately about the donations.)I am…
Read More
8th Day of Trial
29 August 2017 (Posted on 30 August 2017) Dear friends,Thank you for coming to the trial today. It has been a tiring, stressful and felt-like-it-lasted-for-ages one month journey since my 1st day of trial on 1 August 2017.One more day of hearing will be required due to the number of NUS witnesses. Today, my lawyer…
Read More
7th Day of Trial
23 August 2017 (Posted on 25 August 2017) Today, (former) University Registrar A/P Ang Siau Gek gave evidence at the witness stand. It is now clear that two extra days of hearing will need to be “set down” for the remaining 4 NUS witnesses to testify. The next hearing date has been fixed on 29 August 2017…
Read More
6th Day of Trial
22 August 2017 The hearing today was a half-day hearing. The trial tomorrow, 23 August 2017, will be a full-day hearing. Earlier in the morning, NUS’ (former) Vice-Provost Lily Kong was re-examined by the NUS lawyer for a short while and released from the witness stand. The 2nd NUS witness is Assoc Prof Ang Siau…
Read More
5th Day of Trial
21 August 2017 Prof Kong gave evidence on many issues. I will just show one document and let the document speak for itself. (I have reproduced the chain of emails and pasted the chain directly as text in this post.) Background: Before NUS convened the COI hearing in July 2005 to look into my complaint against…
Read More
Court Hearing Resumes on 21 August 2017
20 August 2017 Dear Friends, The court hearing of my lawsuit against NUS will resume on Monday, 21 August 2017, in the Supreme Court. Here are the dates and times: Monday, 21 August 2017, 10 am (morning hearing only) Tuesday, 22 August 2017, 10 am (morning hearing only) Wednesday, 23 August 2017, 10 am (full day)…
Read More
RECAP: 1st Day of Trial / The “Exclusion” of Witnesses
7 August 2017 (Substantive Editing on 11 August 2017) The first 4 days of my trial is now over. I had tried to provide a daily update no matter how brief. From now on, I’ll be blogging about issues of interest or significance arising from the 4 days of hearing last week. The first memorable…
Read More